As a relative newcomer to blogging, I count myself fortunate in my readership. Though my stats are nothing to write home about, I have something much more important (to me at least): a handful of readers apparently willing to think with me. I was reminded of this by a comment left on a recent post about Walter Benjamin’s writing on newspapers, one that began (auspiciously) by quoting me quoting Benjamin:
“Work itself has its turn to speak.” I am letting that line echo a bit in my mind….
As Benjamin also predicts, again, what was old has become new again. Thank you for turning this up.
For me, this succinct comment resonates like crazy. The re-citing of Benjamin’s language (in translation, of course) – “Work itself has its turn to speak” – redirects us to a formulation that appears deceptively brief, almost pithy, and yet is anything but. “I am letting that line echo a bit in my mind” attests that such distilled and difficult thought takes time to unfold, if it is not to vanish irretrievably – succumbing to the threat of disappearance that for Benjamin haunts the dialectical image (a threat that, for blogger and micro-blogger , is part and parcel of reverse chronology). Indeed, it recalls another passage from Benjamin’s writing, one I cited in a post written at the end of 2009 (http://wp.me/pLpwg-19
). “The Writer’s Technique in Thirteen Theses,” part of the volume One-Way Street
, lists the following under number 5: “Let no thought pass incognito, and keep your notebook as strictly as the authorities keep their register of aliens.” My gentle reader is precisely not letting this thought – “Work itself has its turn to speak” – pass unrecognized. (And no one on any side of any border I can think of will miss the stringency of Benjamin’s analogy regarding his notebook-keeping practices.)
The final part of the comment is for me likewise galvanizing: “Thank you for turning this up.” My assumption (and I of course stand ready to be corrected) is that the “turning up” involved is not so much a cranking of the volume as a given track is played, but rather akin to an archaeologist’s (or, more prosaically still, a researcher’s) practice when it meets with some success.
But as I have written here before, this blog’s project is very much one of “turning up” writing from the proximate or more distant past that might help us to take stock of our own present, particularly when it comes to the unpredictably unfolding trajectories of media, journalism and historiography. My own working term and concept for this has been curation, and, for better or worse, this blog is unabashedly curatorial, whether serendipitously or by design.
It goes without saying that I am not the only one who is thinking in terms of curation these days. To borrow once again from an earlier post ( http://wp.me/pLpwg-Fy
), let me cite Mashable
‘s Pete Cashmore: “For those adrift in a sea of content, good news: A ‘curation’ economy is beginning to take shape….” [“Twitter lists and real-time journalism,” http://www.cnn.com/2009/tech/11/04/twitter.lists/index.html
] Whether its inception is late-breaking or old news, there is little doubt that the curation economy is the site of important work, where it may even transpire that “work itself has its turn to speak.”